IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Morris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1981-06-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 40 15 36 51 1.275 0.3125 0.2918 0.8778 0.8196
2001-02 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 49 14 41 55 1.122 0.2751 0.2426 0.7728 0.6816
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 26 3 7 10 0.385
2004-05 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 23 2 16 18 0.783
2003-04 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 21 2 7 9 0.429
2002-03 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 28 6 8 14 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2002-03 · Elmira
+101.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2328
Defenseman overall
#393
Defenseman born in 1981
#258
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Bishop
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Tillinghast
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Manning
Worcester State · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.