IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Krug Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-07-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 37 2 10 12 0.324 0.0795 0.0887 0.2233 0.2491
2009-10 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 53 4 11 15 0.283 0.0694 0.0738 0.1948 0.2071
2010-11 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 50 10 34 44 0.880 0.2157 0.2193 0.6059 0.6160
2011-12 Indiana Ice USHL 56 2 9 11 0.196 0.1159 0.1113 0.5899 0.5663
2012-13 Indiana Ice USHL 52 3 8 11 0.211 0.1248 0.1132 0.6352 0.5760
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Union D1 ECAC SR 21 0 3 3 0.143
2015-16 Union D1 ECAC JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Union D1 ECAC SO 5 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Union D1 ECAC FR 18 0 2 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2013-14 · Union
+4.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10076
Defenseman overall
#1343
Defenseman born in 1992

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dan Carlson
Augsburg · 2003-04
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Chauvin
New England College · 2018-19
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dom Kuziak
Castleton · 2016-17
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.