← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jon Chauvin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-07-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 L/A Nordiques NA3HL 37 5 11 16 0.432 0.0543 0.0563 0.1365 0.1416
2017-18 L/A Nordiques NA3HL 44 14 36 50 1.136 0.1426 0.1407 0.3588 0.3541
2018-19 L/A Nordiques NA3HL 44 20 63 83 1.886 0.2367 0.2211 0.5955 0.5563
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 15 1 0 1 0.067
2021-22 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 13 0 2 2 0.154
2020-21 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 8 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 23 1 6 7 0.304
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2019-20 · New England College
+70.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3179
Defenseman overall
#730
Defenseman born in 1998
#241
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2023-24
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2017-18
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.