IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Eiserman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-07-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Tri-City Storm USHL 54 0 4 4 0.074 0.0437 0.0441 0.2226 0.2245
2012-13 Chicago Steel USHL 34 2 3 5 0.147 0.0868 0.0789 0.4418 0.4014
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Bentley D1 AHA SR 40 2 7 9 0.225
2014-15 Bentley D1 AHA JR 37 1 6 7 0.189
2013-14 Bentley D1 AHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 29 0 4 4 0.138
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2011-12 · UMass Lowell
+231.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21904
Defenseman overall
#2055
Defenseman born in 1992
#4048
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bobby Hineman
Adrian · 2006-07
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Williams
SUNY Oswego · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Tatro
Concordia · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.