IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Koudys Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-11-15 Country: Canada
2011 · Round 5, Pick #147  ·  Washington Capitals Washington Capitals
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Burlington Cougars OJHL 50 5 28 33 0.660 0.1618 0.1749 0.4544 0.4911
2012-13 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 64 1 14 15 0.234 0.1383 0.1279 0.7040 0.6508
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Penn State D1 BigTen SR 36 1 7 8 0.222
2013-14 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 36 2 6 8 0.222
2011-12 RPI D1 ECAC SO 27 1 1 2 0.074
2010-11 RPI D1 ECAC FR 31 1 2 3 0.097
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2010-11 · RPI
-41.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9294
Defenseman overall
#1288
Defenseman born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tye Battipaglia
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rhett Evjen
Stevenson · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Law
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.