IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle McKenzie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-01-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 55 0 7 7 0.127 0.0751 0.0741 0.3823 0.3772
2012-13 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 57 2 6 8 0.140 0.0828 0.0773 0.4217 0.3936
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Providence D1 HockeyEast SR 38 0 5 5 0.132
2015-16 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 37 0 8 8 0.216
2014-15 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 39 1 3 4 0.103
2013-14 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 39 0 6 6 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2013-14 · Providence
+114.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19923
Defenseman overall
#1909
Defenseman born in 1993
#3962
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Allen
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Schindel
Manhattanville · 2006-07
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Langworthy
Bethel · 2016-17
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.