← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aleksi Rossi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-03-15 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 20 0 3 3 0.150 0.0955 0.0899 0.4495 0.4229
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Brown D1 ECAC SR 7 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Brown D1 ECAC JR 12 0 2 2 0.167
2014-15 Brown D1 ECAC SO 5 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Brown D1 ECAC FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#12938
Defenseman overall
#1565
Defenseman born in 1993
#3975
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Alaska
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2005-06
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2015-16
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.