IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Parker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 15 1 3 4 0.267 0.0990 0.1016 0.2824 0.2898
2012-13 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 20 0 4 4 0.200 0.1274 0.1194 0.5993 0.5618
2013-14 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 59 10 24 34 0.576 0.2140 0.1981 0.6102 0.5650
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Alabama-Huntsville D1 — SR 34 1 6 7 0.206
2016-17 Alabama-Huntsville D1 — JR 34 6 9 15 0.441
2015-16 Alabama-Huntsville D1 — SO 34 3 11 14 0.412
2014-15 Alabama-Huntsville D1 — FR 37 0 14 14 0.378
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2014-15 · Alabama-Huntsville
+140.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5501
Defenseman overall
#913
Defenseman born in 1993
#2521
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carson Kelley
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivan Galaguzov
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Bobrow
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.