IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Holland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-02-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — USHL 43 0 4 4 0.093 0.0592 0.0583 0.2787 0.2747
2011-12 — USHL 47 2 5 7 0.149 0.0948 0.0890 0.4462 0.4189
2012-13 — USHL 61 2 9 11 0.180 0.1148 0.1017 0.5403 0.4785
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Miami D1 NCHC FR 14 1 0 1 0.071
2016-17 RIT D1 AHA SR 23 0 4 4 0.174
2015-16 RIT D1 AHA JR 27 1 3 4 0.148
2014-15 RIT D1 AHA SO 20 0 3 3 0.150
2013-14 RIT D1 AHA FR 19 0 1 1 0.053
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2013-14 · RIT
-42.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12898
Defenseman overall
#1610
Defenseman born in 1992
#3972
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Quagliata
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Rowbotham
Amherst · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Affleck
Northland · 2001-02
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.