← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Walicki Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Calgary Canucks AJHL 5 1 1 2 0.400 0.1342 0.1342 0.3690 0.3690
2021-22 Calgary Canucks AJHL 42 6 5 11 0.262 0.0878 0.0887 0.2416 0.2440
2022-23 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 44 13 15 28 0.636 0.1225 0.1187 0.4010 0.3885
2023-24 MJHL 56 17 37 54 0.964 0.1856 0.1701 0.6076 0.5568
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wentworth D3 CNE 16 0 1 1 0.062
2024-25 Wentworth D3 CNE 26 5 8 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2024-25 · Wentworth
+290.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29215
Forward overall
#1680
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's (MN) · 2022-23
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Beloit · 2024-25
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.