← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Newpower Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Park of Cottage Grove USHS-MN 26 10 6 16 0.615 0.0779 0.0779 0.1495 0.1495
2020-21 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 35 13 18 31 0.886 0.1112 0.1112 0.2796 0.2796
2021-22 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 47 37 54 91 1.936 0.2430 0.2349
2022-23 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 45 21 48 69 1.533 0.1924 0.1773
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 26 15 18 33 1.269
2024-25 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 14 4 3 7 0.500
2023-24 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 22 3 5 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2023-24 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+112.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12235
Forward overall
#603
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2022-23
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2022-23
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.