IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Revniaga Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-09-28 Country: Israel
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 West Bend Power NA3HL 43 11 8 19 0.442 0.0555 0.0581 0.1395 0.1460
2017-18 New York Apple Core EHL 41 8 22 30 0.732 0.1690 0.1723 0.3580 0.3650
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Worcester State D1 MASCAC FR 18 2 4 6 0.333
2019-20 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 18 2 4 6 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2019-20 · Worcester State
+207.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
72%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29652
Forward overall
#1459
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeremiah Snyder
Fitchburg State · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Perry Gaudreau
Suffolk · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Muise
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.