IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landon Smith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-10-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 55 8 13 21 0.382 0.2431 0.2489 1.1441 1.1713
2012-13 — USHL 49 13 6 19 0.388 0.2470 0.2397 1.1621 1.1279
2013-14 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 58 43 40 83 1.431 0.5569 0.5282 2.0868 1.9794
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SR 21 5 7 12 0.571
2016-17 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC JR 40 11 18 29 0.725
2015-16 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 43 12 25 37 0.861
2014-15 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 39 15 16 31 0.795
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2014-15 · Quinnipiac
+124.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5861
Forward overall
#227
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lee Stubbs
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Sposit
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Cyprian
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.