IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Clarke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-08-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Collingwood Blues OJHL 49 23 26 49 1.000 0.2794 0.2707 0.6901 0.6687
2006-07 Collingwood Blues OJHL 47 40 32 72 1.532 0.4280 0.3933 1.0572 0.9714
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 28 18 14 32 1.143
2009-10 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 29 12 18 30 1.034
2008-09 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 27 16 23 39 1.444
2007-08 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 30 21 17 38 1.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.27
2007-08 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+329.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6725
Forward overall
#273
Forward born in 1986
#171
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Malcolm Arseneau
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Gibson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trever Hertz
Utica · 2009-10
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.