IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Malcolm Arseneau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-08-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Nepean Raiders CCHL 57 11 23 34 0.597 0.1702 0.1756 0.4618 0.4765
2017-18 — CCHL 61 14 32 46 0.754 0.2152 0.2109 0.5837 0.5721
2018-19 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 17 7 13 20 1.177 0.3358 0.3142 0.9107 0.8522
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fredonia D3 — FR 11 3 6 9 0.818
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.82
2019-20 · Fredonia
+217.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2185
Defenseman overall
#472
Defenseman born in 1998
#308
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyson Gilmour
SUNY Geneseo · 2018-19
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Fritz
Saint John's · 2014-15
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Bates
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.