IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Malcolm Arseneau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-08-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Nepean Raiders CCHL 57 11 23 34 0.597 0.1294 0.1335 0.4615 0.4761
2017-18 — CCHL 61 14 32 46 0.754 0.1636 0.1604 0.5834 0.5718
2018-19 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 17 7 13 20 1.177 0.2552 0.2388 0.9103 0.8518
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fredonia D1 SUNYAC FR 11 3 6 9 0.818
2019-20 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 11 3 6 9 0.818
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.82
2019-20 · Fredonia
+317.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3426
Defenseman overall
#794
Defenseman born in 1998
#240
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyson Gilmour
SUNY Geneseo · 2018-19
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Hoover
Lebanon Valley · 2022-23
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Bates
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.