IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas Culhane Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Brockville Braves CCHL 54 12 21 33 0.611 0.1325 0.1370 0.4731 0.4891
2022-23 Brockville Braves CCHL 50 22 25 47 0.940 0.2039 0.2017 0.7277 0.7198
2023-24 — CCHL 55 24 27 51 0.927 0.2011 0.1882 0.7178 0.6717
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Neumann D3 MAC SO 25 7 27 34 1.360
2024-25 Neumann D3 MAC — 24 11 14 25 1.042
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2024-25 · Neumann
+528.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18278
Forward overall
#929
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zac Boyle
Neumann · 2016-17
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Hull
Marian · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Routledge
Canton · 2017-18
0.619 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.