IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keenan Lund Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Sartell-St. Stephen High USHS-MN 11 8 4 12 1.091 0.1381 0.1409 0.2650 0.2704
2015-16 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 45 19 15 34 0.756 0.0948 0.0985 0.2385 0.2479
2017-18 Minot Minotauros NAHL 46 8 10 18 0.391 0.1438 0.1435 0.4130 0.4123
2018-19 Minot Minotauros NAHL 54 18 31 49 0.907 0.3334 0.3179 0.9578 0.9132
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 23 6 11 17 0.739
2020-21 Air Force D1 AHA SO 4 0 2 2 0.500
2019-20 Air Force D1 AHA FR 23 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20778
Forward overall
#1002
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Massimo Gentile
Colby · 2023-24
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jarrod Fitzpatrick
Utica · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Trann
St. Norbert · 2000-01
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.