IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Massimo Gentile Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 53 13 12 25 0.472 0.1023 0.1051 0.3651 0.3753
2022-23 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 46 30 26 56 1.217 0.2641 0.2596 0.9424 0.9264
2023-24 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 60 31 44 75 1.250 0.4440 0.4237 1.3124 1.2525
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colby D3 NESCAC SO 21 6 6 12 0.571
2024-25 Colby D3 NESCAC — 26 8 11 19 0.731
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2024-25 · Colby
+138.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9641
Forward overall
#418
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Ouderkirk
Norwich · 2017-18
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Stark
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Nesper
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.