← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Ouderkirk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Cornwall Colts CCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Mattawa Blackhawks NOJHL 39 14 18 32 0.821 0.1383 0.1491 0.3409 0.3676
2015-16 NOJHL 46 20 38 58 1.261 0.2126 0.2191 0.5239 0.5399
2016-17 Markham Royals OJHL 54 6 21 27 0.500 0.1397 0.1354 0.3451 0.3346
2017-18 Markham Royals OJHL 54 23 47 70 1.296 0.3622 0.3337 0.8946 0.8243
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 23 12 9 21 0.913
2020-21 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 27 6 18 24 0.889
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 29 15 13 28 0.966
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.97
2018-19 · Norwich
+343.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13880
Forward overall
#565
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2006-07
1.346 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2017-18
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2021-22
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.