IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bradley Becker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Jersey Jr. Titans EHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 New Jersey Jr. Titans EHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1155 0.1271 0.2447 0.2692
2015-16 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 42 6 8 14 0.333 0.1225 0.1281 0.3518 0.3678
2016-17 Bay State Bobcats NA3HL 44 28 35 63 1.432 0.1797 0.1766 0.4520 0.4442
2017-18 Bay State Bobcats NA3HL 47 53 63 116 2.468 0.3097 0.2886 0.7792 0.7262
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Utica D3 UCHC — 3 1 0 1 0.333
2018-19 Utica D3 UCHC — 15 2 3 5 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2018-19 · Utica
+59.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9591
Forward overall
#441
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Emmond Bell
Norwich · 2007-08
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Bessing
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Zembrzycki
Morrisville · 2023-24
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.