← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emmond Bell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-06-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Nepean Raiders CCHL 40 6 9 15 0.375 0.0813 0.0898 0.2901 0.3205
2004-05 Nepean Raiders CCHL 47 17 16 33 0.702 0.1523 0.1616 0.5432 0.5763
2005-06 Nepean Raiders CCHL 56 27 29 56 1.000 0.2169 0.2205 0.7737 0.7866
2006-07 Nepean Raiders CCHL 36 23 17 40 1.111 0.2410 0.2331 0.8597 0.8315
2007-08 Nepean Raiders CCHL 60 35 33 68 1.133 0.2458 0.2259 0.8768 0.8059
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 8 1 5 6 0.750
2010-11 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 29 6 7 13 0.448
2009-10 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 17 7 15 22 1.294
2008-09 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 25 9 7 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2008-09 · Norwich
+226.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12123
Forward overall
#420
Forward born in 1987
#122
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2018-19
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2013-14
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.