IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emmond Bell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-06-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Nepean Raiders CCHL 40 6 9 15 0.375 0.1070 0.1182 0.2903 0.3207
2004-05 Nepean Raiders CCHL 47 17 16 33 0.702 0.2004 0.2126 0.5435 0.5766
2005-06 Nepean Raiders CCHL 56 27 29 56 1.000 0.2854 0.2902 0.7741 0.7870
2006-07 Nepean Raiders CCHL 36 23 17 40 1.111 0.3171 0.3067 0.8601 0.8319
2007-08 Nepean Raiders CCHL 60 35 33 68 1.133 0.3234 0.2973 0.8773 0.8064
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 8 1 5 6 0.750
2010-11 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 29 6 7 13 0.448
2009-10 Norwich D3 — SO 17 7 15 22 1.294
2008-09 Norwich D3 — FR 25 9 7 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2008-09 · Norwich
+148.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9577
Forward overall
#399
Forward born in 1987
#151
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jhuwon Davis
New England College · 2018-19
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Stocks
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Schroeder
Norwich · 2008-09
0.742 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.