← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jhuwon Davis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Metro Jets NA3HL 40 18 27 45 1.125 0.1356 0.1330
2018-19 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 42 15 31 46 1.095 0.1474 0.1376 0.3728 0.3480
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast GR 24 0 2 2 0.083
2022-23 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 26 4 3 7 0.269
2021-22 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 24 3 10 13 0.542
2020-21 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 10 2 1 3 0.300
2019-20 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 27 5 15 20 0.741
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2019-20 · New England College
+537.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29000
Forward overall
#1225
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2000-01
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.