IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Yasin Cissé Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-03-11 Country: Canada
2010 · Round 5, Pick #150  ·  Atlanta Thrashers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 31 2 6 8 0.258 0.1523 0.1683 0.7745 0.8556
2009-10 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 18 13 6 19 1.056 0.6227 0.6481 3.1675 3.2966
2012-13 Blainville-Boisbriand Armada QMJHL 27 8 6 14 0.518 0.2547 0.2279 1.3842 1.2384
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 13 0 2 2 0.154
2011-12 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 26 2 3 5 0.192
2010-11 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#11799
Forward overall
#473
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Seltenreich
University of New England · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Stuart Stefan
Castleton · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Maxwell Donohoe
Neumann · 2023-24
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.