| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Des Moines Buccaneers | USHL | 31 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.258 | 0.1587 | 0.1753 | 0.7604 | 0.8400 |
| 2009-10 | Des Moines Buccaneers | USHL | 18 | 13 | 6 | 19 | 1.056 | 0.6489 | 0.6753 | 3.1100 | 3.2368 |
| 2012-13 | Blainville-Boisbriand Armada | QMJHL | 27 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 0.518 | 0.2578 | 0.2306 | 1.3828 | 1.2371 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Boston University | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 13 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.154 |
| 2011-12 | Boston University | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 26 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.192 |
| 2010-11 | Boston University | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.