← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maxwell Donohoe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 North York Rangers OJHL 50 3 8 11 0.220 0.0539 0.0539 0.1506 0.1506
2020-21 North York Rangers OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 North York Rangers OJHL 47 23 26 49 1.043 0.2555 0.2561 0.7137 0.7154
2022-23 Navan Grads CCHL 36 13 19 32 0.889 0.1928 0.1850 0.6881 0.6602
2023-24 Oakville Blades OJHL 46 16 22 38 0.826 0.2025 0.1821 0.5655 0.5086
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Neumann D3 MAC 27 18 11 29 1.074
2024-25 Neumann D3 MAC 2 2 1 3 1.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.50
2024-25 · Neumann
+856.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27706
Forward overall
#1582
Forward born in 2003
#1388
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wesleyan · 2018-19
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.