IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Suter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-01-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Lincoln Stars USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0637 0.0627 0.2997 0.2948
2011-12 Lincoln Stars USHL 50 8 15 23 0.460 0.2929 0.2744 1.3785 1.2915
2012-13 Lincoln Stars USHL 57 11 16 27 0.474 0.3017 0.2666 1.4195 1.2543
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Bentley D1 AHA SR 25 0 1 1 0.040
2015-16 Bentley D1 AHA JR 27 2 1 3 0.111
2014-15 Bentley D1 AHA SO 31 1 1 2 0.065
2013-14 Bentley D1 AHA FR 21 0 2 2 0.095
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2013-14 · Bentley
-58.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15148
Forward overall
#655
Forward born in 1992
#2280
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Corey Stark
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Hanson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Stuart Stefan
Castleton · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.