IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Walchuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-04 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
KRS-BSU Beijing · VHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1284 0.1429 0.4851 0.5400
2009-10 Vernon Vipers BCHL 56 19 28 47 0.839 0.3234 0.3424 1.2214 1.2931
2010-11 Vernon Vipers BCHL 55 24 32 56 1.018 0.3923 0.3969 1.4818 1.4992
2011-12 Spokane Chiefs WHL 34 10 14 24 0.706 0.3434 0.3212 1.7321 1.6199
2012-13 Spokane Chiefs WHL 70 20 40 60 0.857 0.4170 0.3692 2.1031 1.8618
2013-14 Univ. of Calgary USports-M 3 1 4 5 1.667 0.8794 0.9290 4.8851 5.1607
2014-15 Univ. of Calgary USports-M 28 5 12 17 0.607 0.3203 0.3217 1.7794 1.7874
2015-16 Univ. of Calgary USports-M 28 8 7 15 0.536 0.2826 0.2700 1.5701 1.4998
2016-17 Univ. of Calgary USports-M 28 8 14 22 0.786 0.4145 0.3756 2.3029 2.0867
2018-19 KRS-BSU Beijing VHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 KRS-BSU Beijing VHL 51 6 8 14 0.275 0.4676 0.4676 2.0011 2.0011
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA FR 19 2 6 8 0.421
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2011-12 · Northern Michigan
+31.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6170
Forward overall
#300
Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2013-14
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Gravelle
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.