IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Walchuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1297 0.1444 0.4861 0.5411
2009-10 Vernon Vipers BCHL 56 19 28 47 0.839 0.3267 0.3459 1.2240 1.2958
2010-11 Vernon Vipers BCHL 55 24 32 56 1.018 0.3963 0.4010 1.4848 1.5023
2011-12 Spokane Chiefs WHL 34 10 14 24 0.706 0.3432 0.3210 1.7230 1.6114
2012-13 Spokane Chiefs WHL 70 20 40 60 0.857 0.4167 0.3689 2.0920 1.8520
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Northern Michigan D1 — FR 19 2 6 8 0.421
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2011-12 · Northern Michigan
+29.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5794
Forward overall
#258
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jonathan Schultz
St. Norbert · 2001-02
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Botten
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Padgeon
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.