← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shaquille Merasty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-06-22 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Manitoba · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Portage Terriers MJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Portage Terriers MJHL 59 26 13 39 0.661 0.1272 0.1320 0.4168 0.4327
2010-11 Portage Terriers MJHL 57 22 22 44 0.772 0.1486 0.1470 0.4868 0.4817
2011-12 Portage Terriers MJHL 38 30 30 60 1.579 0.3039 0.2854 0.9957 0.9351
2014-15 Univ. of Manitoba USports-M 28 11 12 23 0.821 0.4334 0.4219 2.4075 2.3436
2015-16 Univ. of Manitoba USports-M 28 14 16 30 1.071 0.5653 0.5224 3.1403 2.9021
2016-17 Univ. of Manitoba USports-M 26 8 13 21 0.808 0.4261 0.3729 2.3674 2.0716
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Adrian D3 NCHA 28 22 16 38 1.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.36
2012-13 · Adrian
+589.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6032
Forward overall
#262
Forward born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2013-14
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.