IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Goodwin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-27 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Mora IK · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.3674 0.3960 1.0555 1.1376
2010-11 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 57 9 17 26 0.456 0.2691 0.2660 1.3699 1.3541
2011-12 — USHL 58 21 28 49 0.845 0.4983 0.4693 2.5373 2.3897
2012-13 — USHL 64 13 30 43 0.672 0.3964 0.3522 2.0180 1.7932
2017-18 SaiPa Liiga 60 10 19 29 0.483 1.2083 1.2249 4.1545 4.2117
2018-19 SaiPa Liiga 58 13 15 28 0.483 1.2070 1.1785 4.1502 4.0521
2019-20 Mora IK Allsvenskan 11 3 1 4 0.364 0.9090 0.9090 3.4113 3.4113
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Penn State D1 BigTen SR 39 11 27 38 0.974
2015-16 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 38 11 27 38 1.000
2014-15 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 36 15 19 34 0.944
2013-14 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 34 7 11 18 0.529
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2013-14 · Penn State
+55.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 19 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#1268
Forward overall
#78
Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.