IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Arkhip Ledenkov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-12-04 Country: Belarus
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 35 33 36 69 1.971 0.2654 0.2676 0.6711 0.6767
2019-20 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 42 48 37 85 2.024 0.2724 0.2724 0.6889 0.6889
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 22 7 10 17 0.773
2022-23 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 24 19 26 45 1.875
2021-22 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 23 11 13 24 1.044
2020-21 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 11 12 6 18 1.636
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.64
2020-21 · St. Scholastica
+614.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
32%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12790
Forward overall
#444
Forward born in 1999
#35
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett D'Andrea
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Peter Krieger
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Pryce
Buffalo State · 2011-12
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn Kennedy
Elmira · 2017-18
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Valadao
Curry · 2012-13
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.