IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kenny Gillespie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-12-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Omaha Lancers USHL 35 5 8 13 0.371 0.2365 0.2436 1.1130 1.1462
2012-13 — USHL 54 11 9 20 0.370 0.2359 0.2304 1.1100 1.0840
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 RPI D1 — SO 35 4 5 9 0.257
2014-15 RPI D1 — FR 15 0 3 3 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2014-15 · RPI
-0.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16069
Forward overall
#605
Forward born in 1993
#2381
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett D'Andrea
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tom Bark
Lake Forest · 2008-09
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor McCloy
Adrian · 2012-13
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Armour
Adrian · 2012-13
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.