IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Vieth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-12-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 45 6 8 14 0.311 0.1835 0.1797 0.9344 0.9150
2013-14 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 58 5 8 13 0.224 0.1322 0.1233 0.6731 0.6276
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SR 28 2 2 4 0.143
2016-17 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA JR 27 3 2 5 0.185
2015-16 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SO 22 1 0 1 0.045
2014-15 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA FR 32 7 2 9 0.281
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2014-15 · Alaska Fairbanks
+125.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27186
Forward overall
#928
Forward born in 1993
#2600
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Hughes
Finlandia · 2007-08
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Ladzinski
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.387 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carlos Fornaris
New England College · 2014-15
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.