IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Vieth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-12-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 45 6 8 14 0.311 0.1981 0.1940 0.9323 0.9129
2013-14 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 58 5 8 13 0.224 0.1427 0.1331 0.6716 0.6262
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Alaska D1 WCHA SR 28 2 2 4 0.143
2016-17 Alaska D1 WCHA JR 27 3 2 5 0.185
2015-16 Alaska D1 WCHA SO 22 1 0 1 0.045
2014-15 Alaska D1 WCHA FR 32 7 2 9 0.281
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2014-15 · Alaska
+108.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19460
Forward overall
#745
Forward born in 1993
#2730
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Ladzinski
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.387 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carlos Fornaris
New England College · 2014-15
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Clayton Boyd
Neumann · 2016-17
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.