IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carlos Fornaris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 41 6 7 13 0.317 0.2019 0.1997 0.9503 0.9399
2014-15 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 50 9 19 28 0.560 0.2079 0.2021 0.5929 0.5763
2015-16 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 29 5 9 14 0.483 0.1793 0.1663 0.5112 0.4743
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 26 9 33 42 1.615
2018-19 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 26 5 28 33 1.269
2017-18 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 25 4 17 21 0.840
2016-17 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 26 9 20 29 1.115
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.12
2016-17 · New England College
+621.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18983
Forward overall
#731
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Rowbotham
Amherst · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Affleck
Northland · 2001-02
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Darcy
New England · 2017-18
0.724 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.