IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Rowbotham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-02-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Orleans Blues CCHL 51 2 10 12 0.235 0.0672 0.0740 0.1821 0.2004
2007-08 — CCHL 51 9 18 27 0.529 0.1511 0.1591 0.4098 0.4314
2008-09 Kemptville 73's CCHL 39 8 15 23 0.590 0.1683 0.1673 0.4565 0.4538
2009-10 Kemptville 73's CCHL 59 22 38 60 1.017 0.2902 0.2751 0.7872 0.7462
2010-11 — CCHL 58 12 31 43 0.741 0.2116 0.1901 0.5739 0.5157
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 29 9 13 22 0.759
2013-14 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 27 5 8 13 0.481
2012-13 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 24 7 18 25 1.042
2011-12 Amherst D3 NESCAC FR 25 6 10 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2011-12 · Amherst
+233.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17027
Forward overall
#721
Forward born in 1990
#466
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Rust
Adrian · 2013-14
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Gooch
Neumann · 2003-04
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wiggle Kerbrat
Wesleyan · 2018-19
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.