IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Darcy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-02-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 34 2 11 13 0.382 0.1148 0.1200 0.3150 0.3294
2016-17 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 5 18 23 0.523 0.1570 0.1565 0.4305 0.4291
2017-18 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 49 7 25 32 0.653 0.1840 0.1717 0.5287 0.4934
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 New England D3 — JR 4 2 1 3 0.750
2019-20 New England D3 — SO 24 4 9 13 0.542
2018-19 New England D3 — FR 29 5 16 21 0.724
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.72
2018-19 · New England
+363.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6387
Defenseman overall
#1129
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vinny Post
Adrian · 2015-16
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John Grealish
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Bobrow
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.