← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Ladzinski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-11-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Atlanta Capitals NA3HL 43 8 8 16 0.372 0.0474 0.0499 0.1177 0.1239
2017-18 Atlanta Capitals NA3HL 47 13 36 49 1.043 0.1328 0.1330 0.3298 0.3304
2018-19 Atlanta Capitals NA3HL 37 23 37 60 1.622 0.2066 0.1961 0.5129 0.4867
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 33 6 4 10 0.303
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 23 5 5 10 0.435
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 SO 6 1 2 3 0.500
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 6 1 2 3 0.500
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 FR 31 7 5 12 0.387
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 31 7 5 12 0.387
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2019-20 · Franklin Pierce
+164.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19448
Forward overall
#932
Forward born in 1998
#388
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Babson · 2016-17
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2014-15
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.