← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Rosa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-18 Country: USA
Babson
Verbal LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 56 16 25 41 0.732 0.2718 0.2763 0.7751 0.7880
2016-17 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 10 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 8 4 7 11 1.375
2019-20 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 23 12 10 22 0.957
2018-19 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 27 14 16 30 1.111
2017-18 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 26 10 8 18 0.692
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2017-18 · Babson
+178.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28532
Forward overall
#1221
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Babson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.44
actual FR PPG at Babson
1.00
actual FR PPG at Babson
0.44
actual FR PPG at Babson
0.88
actual FR PPG at Babson

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2004-05
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.