IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Krieger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-12-09 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Västerviks IK · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 59 22 32 54 0.915 0.3399 0.3455 0.9691 0.9850
2013-14 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 60 26 41 67 1.117 0.7111 0.6620 3.3464 3.1153
2019-20 Västerviks IK Allsvenskan 52 12 10 22 0.423 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC SR 41 9 15 24 0.585
2017-18 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC JR 44 11 19 30 0.682
2015-16 Alaska D1 WCHA SO 36 4 16 20 0.556
2014-15 Alaska D1 WCHA FR 33 5 8 13 0.394
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.50
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2014-15 · Alaska
-21.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1814
Forward overall
#75
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Kyle Novak
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Vecchione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.57 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dominik Shine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.