IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gus Katsuras Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-12-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Wexford Raiders OJHL 27 17 19 36 1.333 0.3725 0.3571 0.9201 0.8820
2001-02 Wexford Raiders OJHL 42 45 46 91 2.167 0.6054 0.5490 1.4952 1.3560
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Hamilton D3 — SR 26 18 20 38 1.462
2004-05 Hamilton D3 — JR 25 22 17 39 1.560
2003-04 Hamilton D3 — SO 26 18 14 32 1.231
2002-03 Hamilton D3 — FR 25 20 15 35 1.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.40
2002-03 · Hamilton
+246.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2572
Forward overall
#138
Forward born in 1981
#13
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Michael Vecchione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.57 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Chad McDonald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Szmyd
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Libonati
Becker · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gabe Randel
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.