IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Filimon Ledenkov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-12-04 Country: Belarus
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 44 27 58 85 1.932 0.2600 0.2622 0.6576 0.6631
2019-20 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 39 21 74 95 2.436 0.3279 0.3279 0.8292 0.8292
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 25 7 23 30 1.200
2022-23 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 23 12 26 38 1.652
2021-22 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 19 9 13 22 1.158
2020-21 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 11 4 14 18 1.636
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.64
2020-21 · St. Scholastica
+629.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
32%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10472
Forward overall
#343
Forward born in 1999
#21
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett D'Andrea
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jory Mullin
Neumann · 2011-12
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Lee
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Boyd
St. Norbert · 2004-05
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.