← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Ulve Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Albert Lea USHS-MN 27 17 23 40 1.482 0.1876 0.1876 0.3599 0.3599
2020-21 Albert Lea USHS-MN 19 23 24 47 2.474 0.3132 0.3132 0.6009 0.6009
2021-22 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 10 4 8 12 1.200 0.1506 0.1525 0.3788 0.3836
2022-23 Houston Bulls NAHL 43 6 15 21 0.488 0.1794 0.1759 0.5155 0.5053
2023-24 Houston Bulls NAHL 57 11 13 24 0.421 0.1547 0.1443 0.4445 0.4145
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 28 9 9 18 0.643
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA 29 5 11 16 0.552
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2024-25 · St. Norbert
+310.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28027
Forward overall
#1607
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2011-12
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.