IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Campbell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 33 6 12 18 0.545 0.0911 0.0928 0.2271 0.2313
2010-11 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 49 25 28 53 1.082 0.1806 0.1744 0.4503 0.4348
2011-12 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 49 18 26 44 0.898 0.1500 0.1369 0.3738 0.3411
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Marian D3 NCHA — 23 2 5 7 0.304
2012-13 Marian D3 NCHA — 26 3 9 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2012-13 · Marian
+255.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27112
Forward overall
#973
Forward born in 1991
#253
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marco Iozzo
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon MacKinnon
Concordia · 2017-18
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Miles
Salem State · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.