← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Young Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-01-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 11 0 5 5 0.455 0.1524 0.1619 0.4212 0.4474
2007-08 AJHL 50 2 15 17 0.340 0.1140 0.1148 0.3151 0.3173
2008-09 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 52 7 21 28 0.538 0.1806 0.1743 0.4991 0.4818
2009-10 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 59 7 34 41 0.695 0.2331 0.2131 0.6440 0.5888
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 27 5 2 7 0.259
2012-13 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 28 5 6 11 0.393
2011-12 Manhattanville D3 SO 24 3 7 10 0.417
2010-11 Manhattanville D3 FR 20 3 7 10 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2010-11 · Manhattanville
+168.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7444
Defenseman overall
#987
Defenseman born in 1989
#956
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2023-24
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.