← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vladislav Sorokin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-14 Country: Russia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 12 6 6 12 1.000 0.3003 0.3296 0.8237 0.9042
2016-17 USPHL-Premier-Classic 24 3 5 8 0.333 0.1001 0.1050 0.2745 0.2880
2017-18 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 27 18 18 36 1.333 0.1795 0.1750 0.4539 0.4426
2018-19 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 41 41 28 69 1.683 0.2028 0.1858
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 6 0 2 2 0.333
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 23 6 2 8 0.348
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2019-20 · Wisconsin-Stout
+124.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23302
Forward overall
#946
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2018-19
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Post · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2012-13
1.320 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.