IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Barter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 New England Stars NA3HL 44 18 16 34 0.773 0.0931 0.0950 0.2441 0.2491
2018-19 New England Stars NA3HL 41 27 18 45 1.098 0.1323 0.1280 0.3467 0.3355
2019-20 New England Stars NA3HL 45 24 30 54 1.200 0.1446 0.1446 0.3791 0.3791
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Post D2 NE10 SR 25 5 6 11 0.440
2022-23 Post D2 NE10 JR 25 5 5 10 0.400
2021-22 Post D2 NE10 SO 26 4 4 8 0.308
2020-21 Post D2 NE10 FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31655
Forward overall
#1413
Forward born in 1999
#631
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sami Salminen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Sullivan
Babson · 2023-24
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Brown
SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gierman
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.