IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Barter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 New England Stars NA3HL 44 18 16 34 0.773 0.0970 0.0990 0.2439 0.2489
2018-19 New England Stars NA3HL 41 27 18 45 1.098 0.1377 0.1332 0.3465 0.3353
2019-20 New England Stars NA3HL 45 24 30 54 1.200 0.1506 0.1506 0.3788 0.3788
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Post D2 NE10 SR 25 5 6 11 0.440
2022-23 Post D2 NE10 JR 25 5 5 10 0.400
2021-22 Post D2 NE10 SO 26 4 4 8 0.308
2020-21 Post D2 NE10 FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21923
Forward overall
#1079
Forward born in 1999
#503
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Brown
SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gierman
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Terry
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.