← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Messa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 14 0 3 3 0.214 0.1317 0.1245 0.6314 0.5971
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast 0 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast 0 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#40141
Forward overall
#1449
Forward born in 1993
#3537
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2015-16
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.