IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Schutt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Lincoln Stars USHL 47 7 13 20 0.425 0.2710 0.2710 1.2751 1.2752
2012-13 Lincoln Stars USHL 62 10 13 23 0.371 0.2363 0.2238 1.1118 1.0528
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SR 40 6 8 14 0.350
2015-16 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC JR 43 6 5 11 0.256
2014-15 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 39 2 4 6 0.154
2013-14 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 36 4 6 10 0.278
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2013-14 · Quinnipiac
+33.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14520
Forward overall
#537
Forward born in 1993
#2199
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Sami Salminen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Bauman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Poulsen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Cox
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Brown
Amherst · 2011-12
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.