IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gage Hough Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 23 1 3 4 0.174 0.1107 0.1154 0.5211 0.5432
2011-12 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 52 6 7 13 0.250 0.0928 0.0957 0.2647 0.2730
2012-13 Omaha Lancers USHL 51 11 9 20 0.392 0.2498 0.2355 1.1753 1.1078
2013-14 Omaha Lancers USHL 59 24 28 52 0.881 0.5613 0.5028 2.6413 2.3659
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Arizona State D1 — SR 14 2 1 3 0.214
2016-17 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast JR 11 2 2 4 0.364
2015-16 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 21 4 1 5 0.238
2014-15 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 8 0 1 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2014-15 · UMass Lowell
-63.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7210
Forward overall
#273
Forward born in 1993
#1161
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Yuel
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Kalinowski
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Donny Flynn
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.