← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Yuel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-10-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Portage Terriers MJHL 41 0 3 3 0.073 0.0207 0.0227 0.0461 0.0506
2004-05 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 55 15 25 40 0.727 0.2058 0.2163 0.4583 0.4816
2005-06 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 59 29 29 58 0.983 0.2781 0.2779 0.6195 0.6191
2006-07 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 46 32 30 62 1.348 0.3813 0.3632 0.8492 0.8088
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 SR 27 8 19 27 1.000
2010-11 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 SR 28 7 6 13 0.464
2009-10 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 JR 25 7 12 19 0.760
2008-09 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Curry D3 FR 26 22 24 46 1.769
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.77
2007-08 · Curry
+528.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13927
Forward overall
#562
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia Wisconsin · 2013-14
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2007-08
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.