← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Yuel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-10-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Portage Terriers MJHL 41 0 3 3 0.073 0.0141 0.0155 0.0462 0.0507
2004-05 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 55 15 25 40 0.727 0.1400 0.1471 0.4586 0.4819
2005-06 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 59 29 29 58 0.983 0.1892 0.1891 0.6199 0.6195
2006-07 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 46 32 30 62 1.348 0.2595 0.2472 0.8499 0.8095
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 27 8 19 27 1.000
2010-11 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 28 7 6 13 0.464
2009-10 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 25 7 12 19 0.760
2008-09 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Curry D3 CNE FR 26 22 24 46 1.769
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.77
2007-08 · Curry
+822.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21886
Forward overall
#739
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2013-14
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2017-18
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2009-10
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.