← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Tyson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 33 12 13 25 0.758 0.2127 0.2289 0.6229 0.6704
2016-17 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 40 4 9 13 0.325 0.1194 0.1202 0.3430 0.3453
2017-18 South Shore Kings NCDC 43 17 23 40 0.930 0.3792 0.3655 0.2639 0.2526
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Hobart D3 SUNYAC 31 11 10 21 0.677
2021-22 Hobart D3 SUNYAC 27 10 17 27 1.000
2019-20 Hobart D1 SUNYAC SO 24 10 7 17 0.708
2019-20 Hobart D3 SUNYAC 24 10 7 17 0.708
2018-19 Hobart D1 SUNYAC FR 31 7 20 27 0.871
2018-19 Hobart D3 SUNYAC 31 7 20 27 0.871
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.87
2018-19 · Hobart
+280.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13835
Forward overall
#624
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2014-15
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2022-23
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.