IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared VanWormer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-09-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 57 13 8 21 0.368 0.1354 0.1426 0.3888 0.4095
2011-12 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 59 20 26 46 0.780 0.2865 0.2876 0.8230 0.8262
2012-13 Soo Eagles NAHL 60 25 51 76 1.267 0.4654 0.4439 1.3370 1.2751
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Ferris State D1 WCHA SR 35 9 14 23 0.657
2015-16 Ferris State D1 WCHA JR 39 7 11 18 0.462
2014-15 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 35 6 8 14 0.400
2013-14 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 27 3 2 5 0.185
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2013-14 · Ferris State
-43.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11153
Forward overall
#457
Forward born in 1992
#318
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Bickley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Saini
Adrian · 2023-24
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott McNulty
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.